The all pervasive Cosmology known as Mechanism
has become more of a psychological mind-set than an affirmable philosophy
of nature. If Thomas Hobbes' opinion that "nothing exists except matter
in motion" is accepted as a given then it would seem to follow that the
only Cosmology in town has to be something that caters for what can be
hefted and measured. Mechanism, often termed Atomism, is actually
far more sophisticated than merely a branch of Mechanics, but ultimately
it denies obvious facts and always excludes one or more of the traditionally
accepted "causes" or explanations which the human intellect seeks naturally;
viz. How did a thing come to be? What is that thing? Of what is it made?
What is its purpose? Aristotle's terms were; First, Material, Formal, and
Final Causes. Warning: Any refutation of Mechanism does not
propose instead that the material universe lacks physical or rather secondary
causation; but that this causation is subtle and profound. Causality for
example must apertain also to the marvel of human intelligence. It must
also embrace direction and control in nature or, at least, explain why
such obvious realities must be denied.
"Contingent events cannot be resolved
into pure meanings which are the proper affair of theoretical understanding;
they are known in some other way." Aquinas.